




| Morton, Washington Cirrus Crash: Should the Pilot Have Deployed the Parachute? |
|
That's the number one question I've been asked about this accident. Not "why did the accident happen," but "why didn't the pilot use the parachute?" As I note here, most Cirrus pilots would say that the parachute should be deployed in the event of engine failure, unless there is a long, paved runway beneath the aircraft such that a safe on-airport landing is assured. But that doesn't mean that, if there is no airport within range, a pilot who opts to glide to a field rather than pull the chute is negligent. Pulling the parachute has serious risks. The aircraft's rate of descent under the parachute is extremely high. Ground impact forces are severe. Cirrus warns that the decision to deploy the parachute should not be made lightly because parachute deployment may result in "severe injury or death to the aircraft occupants." The Cirrus, like every aircraft, comes with a Pilot Operating Handbook. That's the "bible" that the pilot is supposed to follow. The emergency checklist for an "engine out" scenario does not mention the parachute system:
The checklist then sets forth the 12-step "forced landing" checklist. No mention of the parachute, anywhere. In the back of the Handbook, there is a separate section on the use of the parachute. This section lays out various scenarios in which the pilot should consider deploying the parachute, such as after a mid-air collision, aircraft structural failure, or loss of aircraft control One scenario deals with engine failures:
The pilot was not over extremely rough or mountainous terrain. He had picked out what he believed to be a suitable field for a forced landing. The Cirrus Pilot Operating Handbook did not require the pilot to deploy the parachute in the situation he faced. In fact, the Handbook left that decision to the pilot:
Newer news items:
Older news items:
|